The Pink Triangle, or Rosa Winkel
[Trigger Warning for discussion of homophobia, nazism, torture, murder and genocide]
I’m still seeing people who are arguing that the appropriation of the triangle by AVEN isn’t a big deal.
So, a quick history lesson is in order.
[Image may be triggering as it shows concentration camp prisoners imprisoned for homosexuality]
“The real story behind the pink triangle begins prior to World War II. Paragraph 175, a clause in German law, prohibited homosexual relations (much like many states in the U.S. today have laws against “crimes of nature”). In 1935, during Hitler’s rise to power, he extended this law to include homosexual kissing, embracing, and even having homosexual fantasies. An estimated 25,000 people were convicted under this law between 1937 and 1939 alone. They were sent to prisons and later concentration camps. Their sentence also included sterilization, most commonly in the form of castration. In 1942, Hitler extended the punishment for homosexuality to death.
Prisoners in Nazi concentration camps were labeled according to their crimes by inverted colored triangles. “Regular” criminals were denoted by a green triangle, political prisoners by red triangles and Jews by two overlapping yellow triangles (to form the Star of David, the most common Jewish symbol). Homosexual prisoners were labels with pink triangles. Gay Jews- the lowest form of prisoner- had overlapping yellow and pink triangles. This system also created a social hierarchy among the prisoners, and it has been reported that the pink triangle prisoners often received the worst workloads and were continually harassed and beaten by both guards and other prisoners.
Although homosexual prisoners were not shipped en mass to the Aushwitz death camps like so many of the Jewish prisoners, there were still large numbers of gay men executed there along with other non-Jewish prisoners. The real tragedy though occurred after the war. When the Allies defeated the Germany and the Nazi Regime, the political and remaining Jewish prisoners were released from the camps (the regular criminals- murderers, rapists, etc.- were not released for obvious reasons). The homosexual prisoners were never released though because Paragraph 175 remained West German law until 1969. So these innocent men watched as their fellow prisoners were set free, but remained prisoners for 24 more years.
In the 1970s, the pink triangle started to be used in conjunction with the gay liberation movement. When people, especially public figures such as law makers, were confronted with such a symbol, they risked being associated with the Nazis if he or she were to attempt to openly limit or prosecute gays. In the 1980s, when the triangle’s popularity truly began to take off, ACT-UP (AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power) adopted the it as their symbol, but turned it upright to suggest an active fight rather than passive resignation. I’ve also been told that some people wear their triangles pointing up if they personally know somebody who has tied of AIDS. In any case, the pink triangle is definitely a symbol very closely connected to oppression and the fight against it, and stands as a vow never to let another Holocaust happen again. Like the word “queer,” it is a symbol of hate which has been reclaimed and now stands for pride.”
Queer people aren’t jumping all over aces on tumblr for no reason, or because of ‘acephobia’ as some seem to believe. It’s because so many people in the community are doing things that are appropriative, homophobic and fucked up - brushing off the appropriation of symbols without even realising the violent and bloody history behind them, or dismissing it as irrelevant as the holocaust ~happened before their time~. Stop it.
![[Picture: Background: 4 piece horizontal color split with black, grey, white, and purple. Foreground: White guy with glasses and light shadow wearing a sweat shirt over a button down and short black hair. Has a smug, arrogant facial expression and crossed arms. Top text: “You made a very good point that I can’t refute.” Bottom text: “I CAN’T MAKE ANY SENSE OF THIS. YOU MUST BE TROLLING!”]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lm6trjxzXT1qkl1geo1_400.jpg)
[Picture: Background: 4 piece horizontal color split with black, grey, white, and purple. Foreground: White guy with glasses and light shadow wearing a sweat shirt over a button down and short black hair. Has a smug, arrogant facial expression and crossed arms. Top text: “You made a very good point that I can’t refute.” Bottom text: “I CAN’T MAKE ANY SENSE OF THIS. YOU MUST BE TROLLING!”]
An open letter to tumblr “queer hetero-romantic” asexuals
Do you even know where the word ‘straight’ came from? It came from us. From the queer community. At first it meant ex-gays, people who had ‘gone straight’, and then it just meant heteros. It’s our word, do you understand that? We defined it, we still define it. We said “straight” when we talked about heteros who were calling us f*gs and d*kes, and we say “straight” when we’re talking about hetero aces who are calling us trolls and haters and barnacles. When you make posts about how “the queers will never win” we call you straight. You are straight because you are hetero and you are straight because you are attacking us and you are straight because you will never bring us down.
I’m not saying you don’t have problems. Let me repeat that because y’all seem to have convinced yourselves we don’t believe it. ASEXUALITY IS REAL AND IT CAUSES YOU PROBLEMS. But you “queer het” aces on tumblr who have been attacking queers, you can’t pick and choose which of our words are real. You can’t have queer without straight and we get to say who’s straight.
We’ve fought straights for a long, long time. Do you really think, just because your internet buddies are giving you asspats on tumblr, that we’re going to let you demonize and dehumanize us?
WE ARE HERE.
WE ARE QUEER.
WE’RE NOT GOING ANYWHERE.
We are real people whether you want to believe it or not. You are straight and you are cowards.
![[Picture: Background: 4 piece horizontal color split with black, grey, white, and purple. Foreground: White guy with glasses and light shadow wearing a sweat shirt over a button down and short black hair. Has a smug, arrogant facial expression and crossed arms. Top text: “I don’t fuck my opposite sex partner” Bottom text: “That makes me queer doncha [sic] know”]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lm5epfVvOV1qkl1geo1_400.jpg)
[Picture: Background: 4 piece horizontal color split with black, grey, white, and purple. Foreground: White guy with glasses and light shadow wearing a sweat shirt over a button down and short black hair. Has a smug, arrogant facial expression and crossed arms. Top text: “I don’t fuck my opposite sex partner” Bottom text: “That makes me queer doncha [sic] know”]
Anonymous asked: Would you consider someone cisgendered, panromantic, heterosexual to be queer?
Personally I’d raise an eyebrow at anyone calling themselves that because, as a pansexual, I’ve noticed that straight allies like to call themselves “panromantic” to make themselves look more open and accepting even though their romantic and sex lives are completely hetero.
Anonymous asked: So, somebody else can't decide who gets to be queer but you can?
Asexuality is a sexual minority. If you're asexual, you are a member of a sexual minority. I don't give a damn what their romantic orientation is. I don't get to decide their identity and neither do you.
You know why gay/bi/pan/trans/intersex people get to call ourselves queer? Because we're outside the heterosexual and cisgender majority of society. Guess what, so are asexuals.
It isn't all about romantic orientation. Stop identity policing.
Straight people are not queer.
Go look up “appropriation” and then get back to me.
partysoft asked: I want to point something out. someone else on here argued that asexual people aren't discriminated against simply because they aren't as well-known, which is ridiculousness. part of the systemic oppression that queer people face is a concerted, organized effort to erase our existence and our history. the average person has not always been aware that queer people existed, in fact keeping the possibility of queerness unmentionable and invisible further reinforced the "naturalness" and "inevitability" of straightness. queer people were no less oppressed when fewer people were aware of our existence than any other time.
asexual people aren't oppressed because they aren't oppressed, not because people just haven't heard enough about them to decide that they need to start discriminating against them or something.
Thank you!
Anonymous asked: Someone can be straight and queer, if the choose to identify that way. It is completely up to the person in question what their identity is. Who gave you the privilege to choose someone else's identity for them?
You’re right that someone can be straight and queer: If that person is transgender, genderqueer, intersex, or otherwise gender-non-conforming. A cisgender person who is straight is never queer. You can’t just decide that a word means something it doesn’t just because you want into the ~super kewl queer kids club~.
Anonymous asked: Hi there! Just wanted to say that I've been watching this entire debacle since it started, and I'm really glad that you founded this. Being gay myself and having been a victim of violence, the concept of me having privilege, including being able to safely be open about my sexuality, had me raging. I really appreciate what you're doing, and were I confident enough in my articulation I'd be right here fighting this with you. Instead I will offer my full support from the sidelines.
Thank you so much.
Thank you for the support. I feel the same way; I do agree that asexuals who have queer romantic attraction are oppressed, but their oppression is exactly equal to the oppression that we queer sexuals face. And it’s something that I wish no one had to deal with.
Anonymous asked: "Queer is an umbrella term for sexual minorities[1] that are not heterosexual, heteronormative, or gender-binary."
Doesn't that mean all asexuals are queer? Purely based on their sexuality? Asexuality =/= heterosexuality. Thought I'd never have to say that, but here ya go.
Homoromantic, biromantic, and panromantic asexuals are queer. I don’t know whether aromantic asexuals are, but I don’t particularly mind if they call themselves queer.
Heteroromantic asexuals (as long as they are cisgender) are not queer. It is appropriation to use the word that way.
Anonymous asked: I can't believe someone would actually do this. It's bad enough that we get so much shit from heterosexual people, but now the queer community, too? I finally came to terms with accepting myself, but then you suddenly had the brilliant idea of spouting all these lies and misconceptions. It's even difficult for me to just write this down. I want you to know that I'm bawling my eyes out because of you, because of all the hate that you embody.
I hope that unlike me, you have a great day.
I’m having a great day.
I don’t have a problem with most asexual people — would it be appropriate for me to say that ~I have a lot of asexual friends~? The problem I have is threefold:
- Heteroromantic asexuals who try to appropriate the word “queer” when it doesn’t apply to them at all.
- The concept of “only feeling sexual attraction toward someone one has an emotional connection with” as a separate sexual orientation.
- Asexuals who seriously believe that all sexual people, even queer people (who are still legally put to death in some countries), have privilege over them.
I am seriously glad that you’re able to accept your asexuality. But please don’t put words in my mouth.
